The Holy Land continues to be the stage where the struggle for peace, justice and survival are played out in the headlines of the daily papers and in the lives of the inhabitants of this sacred ground.
In The Land, the Bible and History: Toward the Land That I Will Show You, Assumptionist Father Alain Marchadour and Jesuit Father David Neuhaus, Catholic biblical scholars and residents of Jerusalem, present a Catholic perspective of the Holy Land through the ages.
All land is God's land, yet the theological, political and social issues all stem from the ancient promise to the Jewish people of a specific geographical plot of land. The author of this promise is God. The writers ask if this promise gives the Jewish people exclusive rights to the land today and where does this leave the Palestinians who currently live in the land.
Using the Bible as the primary source, the first part of the book considers many biblical texts to highlight the relationship of Israel's dwelling in the land to her faithfulness to the covenant. The land promised to ancient Israel already had inhabitants and the authors underscore the difficulties of theological reflection wherein God drives out others and directly orders their destruction in favor of Israel (Dt 7:16-22)
The authors point out that the land "takes on a different meaning and undergoes an important evolution and transformation, marked as it is, by the person of Jesus Christ."
Jesus himself is rooted in the land from his birth, public ministry and death in Jerusalem. Jesus of Nazareth relates to the land in a different way than merely geographical, which opens up the social and political dimension of the territory for theologian and believer.
Significant space is given to the patristic thought of the church fathers which adds a historical layer to the theological development of the "land ownership" dilemma.
The focus of the latter half of the book is Pope John Paul II's 1984 apostolic letter "Redemptionis Anno." The authors also consider many of the Catholic Church's recent documents pertaining to Israel and Jewish-Christian relations.
Fathers Marchadour and Neuhaus successfully frame the question of the theology of the land in a way that gives theological perspective and hope to all the shareholders in the Holy Land.
Zachary Karabell's book, Peace Be Upon You: The Story of Muslim, Christian and Jewish Coexistence, offers a refreshing and timely perspective on the historical coexistence between Jews, Christians and Muslims in an age when hatred and discrimination seem to be escalating, if not the norm.
With honesty and clarity the author acknowledges the conflicts both past and present between the three major monotheistic religions. Karabell's historical research and ability to bring the stories of centuries past to life is lively and thought-provoking. During periods when one major religion ruled he gives specific instances where there were compromises which allowed for religious freedom and expression.
A more thoughtful consideration of the events surrounding the Holocaust and commentary on the Second Vatican Council's Declaration on the Relationship of the Church to Non-Christian Religions would have assisted many who are interested in the progress and ongoing work of the church and the present state of interreligious dialogue worldwide.
Karabell writes passionately about religious coexistence throughout history and his accentuation of the positive aspects gives hope while not diminishing the suffering of the victims.
- - -
Wright is a member of the Commission for Interreligious Affairs in the Archdiocese of Newark, N.J., and the author of Jesus in the House, published this year by St. Anthony Messenger Press.
- - -
The Land, the Bible and History: Toward the Land That I Will Show You, by Alain Marchadour and David Neuhaus. Fordham University Press (New York, 2007). 232 pp., $40. Peace Be Upon You: The Story of Muslim, Christian and Jewish Coexistence, by Zachary Karabell. Alfred A. Knopf (New York, 2007). 343 pp., $26.95.
The Jerusalem Dilemma: Jews, Christians and Muslims
Obama stated that Jerusalem would remain the capital of Israel and that he would not see the city divided. The issue of Jerusalem is complex and can not be made by Senator Obama or Israel alone. What are the options?
The two-state models for Palestine and Israel, Federal State of Israel-Palestine. The two-state models for Palestinian and Israeli is not working. Many experts on the Middle Eastern politics and people would suggest that a two state solution in not viable model. We have struggled with it for nearly 60 years.
Should we be looking at the region as a Federal States with one government elected by all of the people? This model may have a much better chance of survival as a solution for both Israeli and Arabs.
We have been forced into one box by the Israeli Lobby; we need to look outside of this box. We can’t afford war after war to support a failed two-state model.
Both Jewish and Palestinians have paid a high price for a failed system to consider the human side of the Israeli-Jewish struggle for a lasting peace.
I suggest that only as one nation, Federal State of Israel-Palestine, the peace may endure. We, Americans, have failed to see the both side of the struggle for a lasting peace. As Semitic people, they have common historical and religious heritage.
Obama made it clear that Jerusalem would remain the capital of Israel and that he would not see the city divided. Those who advocate one-state solution as a Federal State would also suggest Jerusalem as the capital of the Federation.
The advocates for one-state solution stress that under a two-state solution, Jerusalem can not be the capital of Israel. This city is religious holy city belonging to Jews, Muslims and Christians. This city should not be controlled by a theocratic Jewish state; in that case, it should be an open international city.
Saint Michael Traveler | 7/27/2008
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, antisocial behavior such as "spamming" and "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will not be posted on Catholic Online. Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our
terms of service. While Catholic Online invites robust discussion, we maintain the right to not print material that is patently false in its claims concerning the teaching of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, overtly anti-Catholic or which, in the opinion of the moderator, are intended to mislead readers as to what the Catholic Church teaches. Comments DO NOT necessarily reflect the opinion or views of Catholic Online.